Government of Gujarat vs MANJABEN W/O SHAKRABHAI PATNI Advocate - P C THAKOR — 1599/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030018802025
e-Filing Number
03-12-2025
Filing Number
1599/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
1599/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250483
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANJABEN W/O SHAKRABHAI PATNI Advocate - P C THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate's court acquitted the accused (Manjaben Shakar Patni) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's claims regarding alleged illicit liquor seizure, and procedural irregularities in the investigation undermined the evidence's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1599/2025
Court Decision Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate's court acquitted the accused (Manjaben Shakar Patni) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's claims regarding alleged illicit liquor seizure, and procedural irregularities in the investigation undermined the evidence's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts