AKTARSHA RAJABSHA FAKIR vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 33/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJBK030004852026

Filing Number

33/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195009250461

Police Station

CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKTARSHA RAJABSHA FAKIR

    Adv. Y U NAGORI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused under Section 480 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), who was charged with extortion, impersonation of police, and criminal intimidacy for allegedly extracting ₹8 lakh from the complainant. The bail was approved on strict conditions including monthly police station reporting, court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and a personal bond of ₹50,000 plus surety, considering the investigation was complete and other co-accused had already been released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused under Section 480 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), who was charged with extortion, impersonation of police, and criminal intimidacy for allegedly extracting ₹8 lakh from the complainant. The bail was approved on strict conditions including monthly police station reporting, court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and a personal bond of ₹50,000 plus surety, considering the investigation was complete and other co-accused had already been released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case