Government of Gujarat vs GEETABEN W/O JAYNTIBHAI KESHABHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - L D JADAV — 137/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030001792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

137/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

137/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195009250696

Police Station

CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GEETABEN W/O JAYNTIBHAI KESHABHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - L D JADAV

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Judgment Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that independent panch (witness) testimony did not corroborate the prosecution's case, investigative procedures were flawed, and reliance solely on police witnesses was insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that independent panch (witness) testimony did not corroborate the prosecution's case, investigative procedures were flawed, and reliance solely on police witnesses was insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case