Government of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI MADHABHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - L D JADAV — 125/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030001672026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
125/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250697
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOVINDBHAI MADHABHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - L D JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate court acquitted the accused Govindbhai Madhabhhai under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding the seizure of illicit liquor, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt in prohibition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate court acquitted the accused Govindbhai Madhabhhai under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding the seizure of illicit liquor, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt in prohibition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts