Government of Gujarat vs Rajeshbhai Madhabhai Devipujak Advocate - L D JADAV — 123/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030001652026
e-Filing Number
13-01-2026
Filing Number
123/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
123/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250695
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajeshbhai Madhabhai Devipujak Advocate - L D JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Rajshbhai Madhbhai Devipujak of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the police investigation findings, and the case relied heavily on uncorroborated police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Rajshbhai Madhbhai Devipujak of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the police investigation findings, and the case relied heavily on uncorroborated police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts