Government of Gujarat vs JAMUBEN W/O BABUJI RADHUJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 87/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030001012026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
87/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250668
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAMUBEN W/O BABUJI RADHUJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Jamubben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that independent panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding the alleged illegal liquor seizure, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt in prohibition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Jamubben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that independent panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding the alleged illegal liquor seizure, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt in prohibition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts