Government of Gujarat vs JAMUBEN W/O BABUJI RADHUJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 87/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030001012026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

87/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

15-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195009250668

Police Station

CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAMUBEN W/O BABUJI RADHUJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Jamubben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that independent panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding the alleged illegal liquor seizure, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt in prohibition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Jamubben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that independent panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding the alleged illegal liquor seizure, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt in prohibition cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case