Government of Gujarat vs JItubhai Chamanji Kagdatar Advocate - L D JADAV — 33/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030000412026
e-Filing Number
22-12-2025
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
03-Jan-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
03-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250568
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JItubhai Chamanji Kagdatar Advocate - L D JADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Jitubhai Chamnji Kagdatar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's narrative about the alleged illicit liquor seizure, and critical procedural irregularities (including improper sealing procedures and lack of independent witness support) undermined the investigation's credibility, necessitating the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2026
Summary of Court Decision The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Jitubhai Chamnji Kagdatar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's narrative about the alleged illicit liquor seizure, and critical procedural irregularities (including improper sealing procedures and lack of independent witness support) undermined the investigation's credibility, necessitating the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts