Government of Gujarat vs Bharatbhai Chamanji kagdatar Advocate - L D JADAV — 31/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030000392026
e-Filing Number
22-12-2025
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250567
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bharatbhai Chamanji kagdatar Advocate - L D JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate court acquitted the accused Bhartbhai Chamanjee Kagdatar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 due to insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish conscious possession of contraband liquor and that independent panch (witness) signatures on the seizure record did not corroborate the police investigation's claims, undermining the credibility of the entire case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Vadodara Judicial Magistrate court acquitted the accused Bhartbhai Chamanjee Kagdatar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 due to insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish conscious possession of contraband liquor and that independent panch (witness) signatures on the seizure record did not corroborate the police investigation's claims, undermining the credibility of the entire case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts