Government of Gujarat vs BABIBEN W/O RADHUJI BHALUJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 11/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030000112026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-12-2025

Filing Number

11/2026

Filing Date

01-01-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

01-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195009250514

Police Station

CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BABIBEN W/O RADHUJI BHALUJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

28-04-2026

Disposed

03-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Babiben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, and relying solely on police testimony without independent corroboration was insufficient to prove the offense of illegal liquor possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Babiben under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, and relying solely on police testimony without independent corroboration was insufficient to prove the offense of illegal liquor possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case