Government of Gujarat vs LAXMANJI HARIJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 6/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030000062026
e-Filing Number
29-12-2025
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250624
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LAXMANJI HARIJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Lakshmanjee Harjee Thakor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, the investigating procedure was deficient, and relying solely on police testimony without independent witness support was insufficient to establish guilt. The defendant was discharged and seized liquor ordered destroyed upon appeal expiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Lakshmanjee Harjee Thakor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, the investigating procedure was deficient, and relying solely on police testimony without independent witness support was insufficient to establish guilt. The defendant was discharged and seized liquor ordered destroyed upon appeal expiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts