Government of Gujarat vs LAXMANJI HARIJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 6/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030000062026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-12-2025

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

01-01-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

01-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195009250624

Police Station

CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LAXMANJI HARIJI THAKOR Advocate - A A JAGRALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

28-04-2026

Disposed

03-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Lakshmanjee Harjee Thakor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, the investigating procedure was deficient, and relying solely on police testimony without independent witness support was insufficient to establish guilt. The defendant was discharged and seized liquor ordered destroyed upon appeal expiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Lakshmanjee Harjee Thakor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, the investigating procedure was deficient, and relying solely on police testimony without independent witness support was insufficient to establish guilt. The defendant was discharged and seized liquor ordered destroyed upon appeal expiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case