M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs RAVIBHAI HARSUKHBHAI POKAR — 18531/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020313822025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18531/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
18531/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL
Adv. P D PATEL
Respondent(s)
RAVIBHAI HARSUKHBHAI POKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decided to dismiss the criminal case, finding that the accused maintained proper relations within the family context and there were no grounds to proceed further with the prosecution. The court determined that since the video evidence cited by the accused was properly preserved and the relations between parties remained intact, the case lacked sufficient merit to continue in the criminal court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decided to dismiss the criminal case, finding that the accused maintained proper relations within the family context and there were no grounds to proceed further with the prosecution. The court determined that since the video evidence cited by the accused was properly preserved and the relations between parties remained intact, the case lacked sufficient merit to continue in the criminal court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts