M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs PASYAM DURGA TARUN S/O P RAMESH — 16455/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020274552025

Filing Number

16455/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

16455/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL

    Adv. P D PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PASYAM DURGA TARUN S/O P RAMESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the criminal petition, holding that the accused had established good relations and there were no concerns about continuing the proceedings. The court directed that the case be referred back to the lower court for adjudication based on video evidence, rejecting the petitioner's request to withdraw or stay the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16455/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the criminal petition, holding that the accused had established good relations and there were no concerns about continuing the proceedings. The court directed that the case be referred back to the lower court for adjudication based on video evidence, rejecting the petitioner's request to withdraw or stay the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case