M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs SARAVANAN THANGARASU — 16352/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020273482025

Filing Number

16352/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

16352/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL

    Adv. P D PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARAVANAN THANGARASU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court (Criminal Case No. 1, Palanpur) decided to dismiss the criminal proceeding against the accused, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court reasoned that the accused maintained innocent relations with all parties involved and there was no proof of misconduct or wrongdoing warranting criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16352/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Criminal Case No. 1, Palanpur) decided to dismiss the criminal proceeding against the accused, finding insufficient evidence of guilt. The court reasoned that the accused maintained innocent relations with all parties involved and there was no proof of misconduct or wrongdoing warranting criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case