M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs MOHIT BATHLA — 16303/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020272962025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
16303/2025
Filing Date
04-11-2025
Registration No
16303/2025
Registration Date
04-11-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL
Adv. P D PATEL
Respondent(s)
MOHIT BATHLA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 15-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the criminal case, finding that the accused had not committed any offense regarding the alleged vidio pursis matter. The court ruled that since no substantial evidence of wrongdoing was established and the charges lacked merit, the case should be closed and the accused acquitted in the public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the criminal case, finding that the accused had not committed any offense regarding the alleged vidio pursis matter. The court ruled that since no substantial evidence of wrongdoing was established and the charges lacked merit, the case should be closed and the accused acquitted in the public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts