Government of Gujarat vs DAUDABHAI JUSABABHAI SUMARA — 15089/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 661b. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020251022025
Filing Number
15089/2025
Filing Date
08-Oct-2025
Registration No
15089/2025
Registration Date
08-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195024250439
Police Station
GADH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAUDABHAI JUSABABHAI SUMARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused, Daudbhai Jusabbhai Sumra, guilty under Section 66(1)B of the Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession and convicted him accordingly. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and simple imprisonment until the court rises, considering it was his first offense and applying the principle that lighter punishment is warranted when sufficient grounds exist, rather than imposing the maximum statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 15089/2025
The court found the accused, Daudbhai Jusabbhai Sumra, guilty under Section 66(1)B of the Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession and convicted him accordingly. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and simple imprisonment until the court rises, considering it was his first offense and applying the principle that lighter punishment is warranted when sufficient grounds exist, rather than imposing the maximum statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts