M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs SRINIVASA B S/O BAVANNA — 13430/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020223072025

Filing Number

13430/2025

Filing Date

08-Sep-2025

Registration No

13430/2025

Registration Date

08-Sep-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL

    Adv. P D PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRINIVASA B S/O BAVANNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court (Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palanpur) dismissed a criminal case, finding insufficient evidence against the accused. The judgment states that since all relevant relationships and circumstances in the case have been properly examined, the accused is acquitted and the case is closed on the basis of video evidence presented before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 04-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13430/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palanpur) dismissed a criminal case, finding insufficient evidence against the accused. The judgment states that since all relevant relationships and circumstances in the case have been properly examined, the accused is acquitted and the case is closed on the basis of video evidence presented before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case