M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs IVEN STANLEY VANSPAUL CHARLES ANTONY — 13384/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020222562025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13384/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
13384/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL
Adv. P D PATEL
Respondent(s)
IVEN STANLEY VANSPAUL CHARLES ANTONY
Hearing History
Judge: 2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 15-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition, holding that since all relevant relationships and connections in the matter remain intact, there is no valid ground to continue proceedings. The court reasoned that the petition should not be pursued further and accordingly directed that the case be referred back to the lower court for closure based on the video evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition, holding that since all relevant relationships and connections in the matter remain intact, there is no valid ground to continue proceedings. The court reasoned that the petition should not be pursued further and accordingly directed that the case be referred back to the lower court for closure based on the video evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts