M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs MAJID ANISH ANSARI — 12327/2025

Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020209042025

Filing Number

12327/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

12327/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL

    Adv. P D PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAJID ANISH ANSARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court decided to dismiss the petition, holding that all relationships and connections between the appellant and respondent remain intact, and therefore the appellant has no grounds to pursue further proceedings. The court reasoned that since the video evidence supporting the petition exists, the matter should proceed to the public court for appropriate action regarding evidence submission. The judgment dated March 14, 2026, was delivered by Justice A.R. Trivedi. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12327/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court decided to dismiss the petition, holding that all relationships and connections between the appellant and respondent remain intact, and therefore the appellant has no grounds to pursue further proceedings. The court reasoned that since the video evidence supporting the petition exists, the matter should proceed to the public court for appropriate action regarding evidence submission. The judgment dated March 14, 2026, was delivered by Justice A.R. Trivedi. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case