PATEL KANTIBHAI MAGANBHAI PROPRITER OF HIRAL AUTO FINANCE vs DILIPBHAI BHALABHAI PATHAR — 7316/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020131302025
Filing Number
7316/2025
Filing Date
23-May-2025
Registration No
7316/2025
Registration Date
23-May-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL KANTIBHAI MAGANBHAI PROPRITER OF HIRAL AUTO FINANCE
Adv. J B GAUSWAMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DILIPBHAI BHALABHAI PATHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary In Criminal Case No. 7316 of 2025, the Permanent Lok Adalat at Palanpur ordered the case to be disposed of as withdrawn on 18th April 2026. The complainant's advocate produced withdrawal documents (Ex.11) and declared that the case had been settled between the parties, leading the court to grant the withdrawal request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 7316/2025
Summary In Criminal Case No. 7316 of 2025, the Permanent Lok Adalat at Palanpur ordered the case to be disposed of as withdrawn on 18th April 2026. The complainant's advocate produced withdrawal documents (Ex.11) and declared that the case had been settled between the parties, leading the court to grant the withdrawal request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts