SHANKARLAL ISHVARLAL NAI vs KALPESHBHAI SHANTIBHAI PRAJAPATI — 6494/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020111952025
Filing Number
6494/2025
Filing Date
03-May-2025
Registration No
6494/2025
Registration Date
03-May-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANKARLAL ISHVARLAL NAI
Adv. N P FOFANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALPESHBHAI SHANTIBHAI PRAJAPATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary: The court dismissed the criminal case, finding that the accused had no connection to the allegations and that all relationships mentioned in the complaint were intact. The court ruled that since the accused had not committed any offense and the video evidence was without merit, the case would be forwarded to the lower court (Lok Adalat) for disposal based on the video evidence guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6494/2025
Summary: The court dismissed the criminal case, finding that the accused had no connection to the allegations and that all relationships mentioned in the complaint were intact. The court ruled that since the accused had not committed any offense and the video evidence was without merit, the case would be forwarded to the lower court (Lok Adalat) for disposal based on the video evidence guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts