Government of Gujarat vs JASPRITSING GURUCHARANSING SINDH Advocate - G G CHAUDHARY — 5589/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),125(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020096802025
Filing Number
5589/2025
Filing Date
05-04-2025
Registration No
5589/2025
Registration Date
05-04-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1195035250016
Police Station
PALANPUR TALUKA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JASPRITSING GURUCHARANSING SINDH Advocate - G G CHAUDHARY
Hearing History
Judge: 2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Palanpur acquitted the accused Jaspreet Singh of charges under BNS sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and MV Act sections 177, 184, 134, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged hit-and-run accident case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant's witnesses provided inconsistent testimonies lacking concrete evidence, and no substantive proof was produced linking the accused to the injury of the complainant's daughter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Palanpur acquitted the accused Jaspreet Singh of charges under BNS sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and MV Act sections 177, 184, 134, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged hit-and-run accident case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant's witnesses provided inconsistent testimonies lacking concrete evidence, and no substantive proof was produced linking the accused to the injury of the complainant's daughter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts