JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL, AUTHORIZED PERSON OF M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED vs GOSWAMI ASHVINPURI — 6264/2024
Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020091022024
Filing Number
6264/2024
Filing Date
22-Oct-2024
Registration No
6264/2024
Registration Date
22-Oct-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL, AUTHORIZED PERSON OF M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED
Adv. P D PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOSWAMI ASHVINPURI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court decided to dismiss the criminal case, ruling that the accused's video evidence established innocence regarding the allegations of maintaining relationships in violation of public morality and indecency. The court found no basis to proceed further with the prosecution based on the video evidence presented by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Feb-2026
Plea
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-May-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 6264/2024
The court decided to dismiss the criminal case, ruling that the accused's video evidence established innocence regarding the allegations of maintaining relationships in violation of public morality and indecency. The court found no basis to proceed further with the prosecution based on the video evidence presented by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts