GAUTHI GODADBHAI RANCHODBHAI vs LATE SARDARBHAI CHELABHAI JARMOL HEIRS OF MANGUBEN SARDARBHAI JARMOL Advocate - A N SHERA — 97/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK020070632018
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
97/2018
Filing Date
28-11-2018
Registration No
97/2018
Registration Date
28-11-2018
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAUTHI GODADBHAI RANCHODBHAI
Adv. M R DERYA
GAUTHI MANIBEN PASHABHAI
Adv. M R DERYA
GAUTHI RAJESHBHAI PASHABHAI
Adv. M R DERYA
Respondent(s)
LATE SARDARBHAI CHELABHAI JARMOL HEIRS OF MANGUBEN SARDARBHAI JARMOL Advocate - A N SHERA
NARESHBHAI SARDARBHAI JARMOL
Adv. A N SHERA
JAYANTIBHAI SARDARBHAI JARMOL
Adv. A N SHERA
MANJULABEN SARDARBHAI JARMOL
Adv. A N SHERA
PINKIBEN SARDARBHAI JARMOL
Adv. A N SHERA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 21-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: RCS 97/2018 (Palapur, Banaskantha District, Gujarat) Outcome: The court granted the plaintiffs' application for interim relief (stay order) preventing the defendants from interfering with the disputed agricultural property (Survey No. 1017/1, measuring 0-92-95 hectares). The court rejected the defendants' counter-application for interim relief. The stay order prohibits the defendants, their agents, or employees from trespassing, damaging crops, obstructing farming activities, or altering revenue records pending final judgment. The court found the plaintiffs had a prima facie case with balance of convenience in their favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: RCS 97/2018 (Palapur, Banaskantha District, Gujarat) Outcome: The court granted the plaintiffs' application for interim relief (stay order) preventing the defendants from interfering with the disputed agricultural property (Survey No. 1017/1, measuring 0-92-95 hectares). The court rejected the defendants' counter-application for interim relief. The stay order prohibits the defendants, their agents, or employees from trespassing, damaging crops, obstructing farming activities, or altering revenue records pending final judgment. The court found the plaintiffs had a prima facie case with balance of convenience in their favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts