BHARAT SHANTILAL THAKOR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF I.C.I.C.I. BANK LTD vs RUPABHAI JIVABHAI PURABIYA Advocate - Z I MIR — 5531/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020064402022

Filing Number

5531/2022

Filing Date

25-Nov-2022

Registration No

5531/2022

Registration Date

25-Nov-2022

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SHANTILAL THAKOR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF I.C.I.C.I. BANK LTD

    Adv. R K THARWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUPABHAI JIVABHAI PURABIYA Advocate - Z I MIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate found the accused Rupaabhai Jivabhai Purbiaya guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (dishonored cheque) and sentenced him to simple imprisonment until rising of court plus a fine of ₹2,000 (5 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid). Key Reasoning: ICICI Bank's manager presented conclusive evidence that the accused received a farm loan, issued a cheque for repayment which bounced due to insufficient funds, was legally served notice, but failed to pay within 15 days—satisfying all elements of Section 138 offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 30-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    7th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  22. 20-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  23. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 02-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 04-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 13-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 18-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 07-Aug-2023

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 03-Jul-2023

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 29-May-2023

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  46. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  47. 20-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 23-Jan-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 26-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 25-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5531/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate found the accused Rupaabhai Jivabhai Purbiaya guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (dishonored cheque) and sentenced him to simple imprisonment until rising of court plus a fine of ₹2,000 (5 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid). Key Reasoning: ICICI Bank's manager presented conclusive evidence that the accused received a farm loan, issued a cheque for repayment which bounced due to insufficient funds, was legally served notice, but failed to pay within 15 days—satisfying all elements of Section 138 offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case