BHAVNABEN D/O GANESHBHAI KALUBHAI PRAJAPATI AND W/O BHARATBHAI ISHWARBHAI PRAJAPATI vs BHARATBHAI ISHWARBHAI PARJAPATI Advocate - N R GOYAL — 540/2017

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 017,018,019,022,023. Status: Evidence Of Applicant. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Evidence Of Applicant Next hearing 06-May-2026

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJBK020057702017

Filing Number

540/2017

Filing Date

27-Dec-2017

Registration No

540/2017

Registration Date

27-Dec-2017

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

4-5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 017,018,019,022,023

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAVNABEN D/O GANESHBHAI KALUBHAI PRAJAPATI AND W/O BHARATBHAI ISHWARBHAI PRAJAPATI

    Adv. R P BAROT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI ISHWARBHAI PARJAPATI Advocate - N R GOYAL

  2. 2.VASHRAMBHAI ISHWARBHAI PRAJAPATI

    Adv. D.I.CONTRACTOR

  3. 3.JYUTSHANABEN VASHRAMBHAI PRAJAPATI

    Adv. D.I.CONTRACTOR

  4. 4.SANTOKBEN ISHWARBHAI PRAJAPATI

    Adv. D.I.CONTRACTOR

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 21-May-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  11. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Dec-2024

    Restored

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 19-Dec-2024

    Notice To Complainant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 01-Apr-2023

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary This Domestic Violence Act petition (CRMA NO -540/2017) from the Palanapur Court was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish domestic violence against the respondents as required under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner's claims of physical abuse, threats, and harassment were not substantiated with sufficient evidence, and the court noted that not every marital dispute qualifies as domestic violence requiring court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 01-Apr-2023

    Disposed

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  18. 02-Mar-2023

    Order/Judgement

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  19. 14-Feb-2023

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  20. 06-Feb-2023

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  21. 30-Jan-2023

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  22. 02-Jan-2023

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  23. 29-Dec-2022

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  24. 14-Dec-2022

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  25. 30-Nov-2022

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  26. 19-Nov-2022

    Order/Judgement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  27. 15-Oct-2022

    Final Hearing

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  28. 26-Sep-2022

    Final Hearing

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  29. 17-Aug-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  30. 30-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  31. 05-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  32. 01-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  33. 18-Jun-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  34. 19-May-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  35. 06-Apr-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  36. 08-Mar-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  37. 25-Jan-2022

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  38. 29-Dec-2021

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  39. 23-Nov-2021

    Process To Opponent

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  40. 18-Oct-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  41. 23-Sep-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  42. 15-Jul-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  43. 13-May-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  44. 18-Mar-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  45. 18-Feb-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  46. 29-Jan-2021

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  47. 02-Dec-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  48. 30-Sep-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  49. 27-Jul-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  50. 27-May-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  51. 30-Mar-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  52. 29-Feb-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  53. 04-Jan-2020

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  54. 14-Nov-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  55. 16-Oct-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  56. 23-Sep-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 12-Sep-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 30-Aug-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 09-Aug-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 05-Jul-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  61. 31-May-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  62. 26-Apr-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  63. 22-Feb-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  64. 11-Jan-2019

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  65. 07-Dec-2018

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  66. 02-Nov-2018

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  67. 20-Oct-2018

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  68. 30-Aug-2018

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  69. 26-Jul-2018

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  70. 25-Jun-2018

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  71. 29-May-2018

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  72. 04-May-2018

    Process To Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  73. 06-Apr-2018

    Process To Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  74. 05-Mar-2018

    Process To Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  75. 23-Feb-2018

    Process To Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  76. 19-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 27-Dec-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 540/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This Domestic Violence Act petition (CRMA NO -540/2017) from the Palanapur Court was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish domestic violence against the respondents as required under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner's claims of physical abuse, threats, and harassment were not substantiated with sufficient evidence, and the court noted that not every marital dispute qualifies as domestic violence requiring court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case