VAGHELA MUKESHSINH GAMANSINH vs VAJESINH MADARSINH VAGHELA — 257/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(a),125(b),106(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJBK020051872026
Filing Number
257/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
257/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VAGHELA MUKESHSINH GAMANSINH
Adv. R V SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.VAJESINH MADARSINH VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The 4th ACJM Court, Palanpur dismissed the accused's petition, finding that the complaint allegations establish cognizable offences under IPC sections 281, 125(a)-(b), 106(1), and IPC sections 177, 184, 233, involving rash/negligent driving causing death and related charges. The court held that a magistrate must verify the truth and veracity of allegations before ordering police investigation, applying Supreme Court precedents; here, credible evidence (medical records, witness statements, police reports) demonstrated the essential elements of the offences on first impression, making prosecution warranted and dismissing claims of abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 257/2026
Case Summary The 4th ACJM Court, Palanpur dismissed the accused's petition, finding that the complaint allegations establish cognizable offences under IPC sections 281, 125(a)-(b), 106(1), and IPC sections 177, 184, 233, involving rash/negligent driving causing death and related charges. The court held that a magistrate must verify the truth and veracity of allegations before ordering police investigation, applying Supreme Court precedents; here, credible evidence (medical records, witness statements, police reports) demonstrated the essential elements of the offences on first impression, making prosecution warranted and dismissing claims of abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts