DUKE PIPES PRIVETE LIMITED BEHALF HITESHA SHAH vs AJINKY AGRO AGANCY BEHALF AJINKY SUDHAKAR MAGAR Advocate - D J DHARANI — 3720/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020050922024
Filing Number
3720/2024
Filing Date
29-06-2024
Registration No
3720/2024
Registration Date
29-06-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DUKE PIPES PRIVETE LIMITED BEHALF HITESHA SHAH
Adv. C B PUJARA
Respondent(s)
AJINKY AGRO AGANCY BEHALF AJINKY SUDHAKAR MAGAR Advocate - D J DHARANI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 31-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
| 02-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The 4th Additional Senior Civil Judge & ACJM Palanpur convicted Ajinkya Sudhakar Magar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs.3,87,127/- with insufficient funds. The court applied statutory presumptions and found the accused failed to rebut them or present any defense, having remained absent for cross-examination. He was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs.3,87,127/- within 30 days or face an additional 6 months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The 4th Additional Senior Civil Judge & ACJM Palanpur convicted Ajinkya Sudhakar Magar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs.3,87,127/- with insufficient funds. The court applied statutory presumptions and found the accused failed to rebut them or present any defense, having remained absent for cross-examination. He was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs.3,87,127/- within 30 days or face an additional 6 months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts