Government of Gujarat vs RAFIKBHAI ISUBBHAI BELIM — 2441/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020038602026

Filing Number

2441/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

2441/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

4-5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195010251047

Police Station

PALANPUR CITY WEST POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAFIKBHAI ISUBBHAI BELIM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Banaskantha convicted the accused Rafikbhai Issubhai Belim under BNS Section 285 (rash or negligent act causing danger) after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with simple imprisonment of two days in default, considering his first-time offense, financial circumstances, and mitigating factors rather than imposing maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2441/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Banaskantha convicted the accused Rafikbhai Issubhai Belim under BNS Section 285 (rash or negligent act causing danger) after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with simple imprisonment of two days in default, considering his first-time offense, financial circumstances, and mitigating factors rather than imposing maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case