Government of Gujarat vs MOHSIN GULAMNABI MANSURI — 2413/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020038152026

Filing Number

2413/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

2413/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195034250920

Police Station

PALANPUR CITY EAST POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHSIN GULAMNABI MANSURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Mohsin Gulamnabi Mansuri, guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to animal) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 with imprisonment until the rising of the court, or two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and imposed a lenient sentence considering it was his first offense and taking into account his financial circumstances and mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Mohsin Gulamnabi Mansuri, guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to animal) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 with imprisonment until the rising of the court, or two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and imposed a lenient sentence considering it was his first offense and taking into account his financial circumstances and mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case