M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL vs AMAN SANTOSHKUMAR CHAUBEY — 2119/2026

Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020031812026

Filing Number

2119/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

2119/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED AUTHORIZED PERSON OF JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL

    Adv. P D PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMAN SANTOSHKUMAR CHAUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the criminal appeal, finding that the accused's video evidence of a woman was obtained in violation of her privacy and without consent. The court held that such unauthorized video recording constitutes an offense under applicable law and rejected the appellant's argument to continue proceedings, ordering the case to be transferred to public court with video evidence as basis for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2119/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the criminal appeal, finding that the accused's video evidence of a woman was obtained in violation of her privacy and without consent. The court held that such unauthorized video recording constitutes an offense under applicable law and rejected the appellant's argument to continue proceedings, ordering the case to be transferred to public court with video evidence as basis for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case