Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI KALUBHAI BAJANIYA — 1762/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK020026932026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1762/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

1762/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195034250843

Police Station

PALANPUR CITY EAST POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 285,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VINODBHAI KALUBHAI BAJANIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

20-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused, Vinodbhai Kalubhai Bajaniya, guilty under BNS Section 285 after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering it was his first offense and applying mitigating circumstances including his economic condition and the principles established in the Gujarat High Court's decision in Gujarat v. Nartavarlal Harchandji Thakor, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Vinodbhai Kalubhai Bajaniya, guilty under BNS Section 285 after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering it was his first offense and applying mitigating circumstances including his economic condition and the principles established in the Gujarat High Court's decision in Gujarat v. Nartavarlal Harchandji Thakor, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until the rising of court, with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case