JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL, AUTHORIZED PERSON OF M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED vs ROUSHAN KUMAR S/O NAVEEN KUMAR SHARMA — 721/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020010442025
Filing Number
721/2025
Filing Date
16-Jan-2025
Registration No
721/2025
Registration Date
16-Jan-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL, AUTHORIZED PERSON OF M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED
Adv. P D PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROUSHAN KUMAR S/O NAVEEN KUMAR SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The court rejected the accused's petition seeking to withdraw the criminal case, finding no valid grounds for discontinuation. The court ordered the case to proceed in public court with video recording, as the accused's video consent petition lacked merit and the investigation had substantiated the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
6th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-May-2025
Process To Accused
4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
29-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
24-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 721/2025
Summary The court rejected the accused's petition seeking to withdraw the criminal case, finding no valid grounds for discontinuation. The court ordered the case to proceed in public court with video recording, as the accused's video consent petition lacked merit and the investigation had substantiated the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts