JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL, AUTHORIZED PERSON OF M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED vs ROUSHAN KUMAR S/O NAVEEN KUMAR SHARMA — 721/2025
Case under Payment and Settlement Act, 2007 Section 25,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK020010442025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
721/2025
Filing Date
16-01-2025
Registration No
721/2025
Registration Date
16-01-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PALANPUR
Judge
2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JIGARKUMAR NARMADA SHANKAR RAVAL, AUTHORIZED PERSON OF M/S. SAMPATI SECURITIES LIMITED
Adv. P D PATEL
Respondent(s)
ROUSHAN KUMAR S/O NAVEEN KUMAR SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-6th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 18-10-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the accused's petition seeking to withdraw the criminal case, finding no valid grounds for discontinuation. The court ordered the case to proceed in public court with video recording, as the accused's video consent petition lacked merit and the investigation had substantiated the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the accused's petition seeking to withdraw the criminal case, finding no valid grounds for discontinuation. The court ordered the case to proceed in public court with video recording, as the accused's video consent petition lacked merit and the investigation had substantiated the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts