Government of Gujarat vs BHIKHABHAI MANGABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - U B ACHARYA — 7/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
GLGP - GUJARAT LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL CASES
CNR: GJBK010049142025
Filing Number
7/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195015250585
Police Station
DANTA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. T A TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
BHIKHABHAI MANGABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - U B ACHARYA
BHIKHABHAI NATHABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. U B ACHARYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 7/2025 The Special Judge (Land Grabbing Act) court acquitted both accused—Bhikhabhai Mangabhai Solanki and Bhikhabhai Nathabhai Solanki—of charges under IPC Section 341(3), 342 and the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Restriction) Act Sections 4(3), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally occupied the complainant's plot through force and intimidation. The defense successfully argued the dispute arose from misunderstandings regarding revenue records and land boundaries, with the complainant ultimately recovering full possession of the property through negotiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 7/2025 The Special Judge (Land Grabbing Act) court acquitted both accused—Bhikhabhai Mangabhai Solanki and Bhikhabhai Nathabhai Solanki—of charges under IPC Section 341(3), 342 and the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Restriction) Act Sections 4(3), 4(b), 4(c), 4(d). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally occupied the complainant's plot through force and intimidation. The defense successfully argued the dispute arose from misunderstandings regarding revenue records and land boundaries, with the complainant ultimately recovering full possession of the property through negotiation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts