JAYANTIBHAI D. BOKA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA — 398/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 03rd April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBK010045172025
Filing Number
398/2025
Filing Date
09-Dec-2025
Registration No
398/2025
Registration Date
09-Dec-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYANTIBHAI D. BOKA
Adv. A A MAKNOJIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA
-
2.BABUBHAI GOPALBHAI NAYI
Adv. J B GAUSWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Court, Palanpur dismissed Jayantibhai D. Boka's appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 8,56,680 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to two years simple imprisonment and directed payment of the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment in case of default. The court found all statutory requirements satisfied, including proper demand notice service and timely complaint filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 398/2025
Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Court, Palanpur dismissed Jayantibhai D. Boka's appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 8,56,680 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to two years simple imprisonment and directed payment of the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment in case of default. The court found all statutory requirements satisfied, including proper demand notice service and timely complaint filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts