JAYANTIBHAI D. BOKA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA — 398/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3),. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 03rd April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBK010045172025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
398/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
398/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYANTIBHAI D. BOKA
Adv. A A MAKNOJIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA
BABUBHAI GOPALBHAI NAYI
Adv. J B GAUSWAMI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 31-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Court, Palanpur dismissed Jayantibhai D. Boka's appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 8,56,680 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to two years simple imprisonment and directed payment of the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment in case of default. The court found all statutory requirements satisfied, including proper demand notice service and timely complaint filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Court, Palanpur dismissed Jayantibhai D. Boka's appeal and upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 8,56,680 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to two years simple imprisonment and directed payment of the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment in case of default. The court found all statutory requirements satisfied, including proper demand notice service and timely complaint filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts