KANTIBHAI JAKSIBHAI BHARTHARI HEIRS OF BHARATIBEN KANTIBHAI BHARTHARI vs PANKAJKUMAR MOHANLAL SONI Advocate - Y P CHAVDA — 4/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O47,R1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
MACRP - MAC REVIEW APPLICATION
CNR: GJBK010029812025
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
05-Aug-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANTIBHAI JAKSIBHAI BHARTHARI HEIRS OF BHARATIBEN KANTIBHAI BHARTHARI
Adv. D.D.SWAMI
-
2.HARJIBHAI KANTIBHAI BHARATHARI
-
3.BHEDIBEN KENTIBHAI BHARTHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANKAJKUMAR MOHANLAL SONI Advocate - Y P CHAVDA
-
2.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Banaskantha) allowed the review petition to correct a clerical error in the original award. The tribunal added claimant "Dehliben" (Appellant No. 4) as a proper party to the case and ordered the compensation of Rs. 14 lakhs to be equally divided among three claimants instead of four. Additionally, 50% of the awarded amount will be paid immediately to the first claimant, while the remaining 50% for the minor claimants (Appellants 2 and 3) will be deposited in fixed deposits until they attain majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2025
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Service Of Process
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2025
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Banaskantha) allowed the review petition to correct a clerical error in the original award. The tribunal added claimant "Dehliben" (Appellant No. 4) as a proper party to the case and ordered the compensation of Rs. 14 lakhs to be equally divided among three claimants instead of four. Additionally, 50% of the awarded amount will be paid immediately to the first claimant, while the remaining 50% for the minor claimants (Appellants 2 and 3) will be deposited in fixed deposits until they attain majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts