KANTIBHAI JAKSIBHAI BHARTHARI HEIRS OF BHARATIBEN KANTIBHAI BHARTHARI vs PANKAJKUMAR MOHANLAL SONI Advocate - Y P CHAVDA — 4/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O47,R1,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

MACRP - MAC REVIEW APPLICATION

CNR: GJBK010029812025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2025

Filing Date

05-08-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

05-08-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section O47,R1,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 229,151,

Petitioner(s)

KANTIBHAI JAKSIBHAI BHARTHARI HEIRS OF BHARATIBEN KANTIBHAI BHARTHARI

Adv. D.D.SWAMI

HARJIBHAI KANTIBHAI BHARATHARI

BHEDIBEN KENTIBHAI BHARTHARI

Respondent(s)

PANKAJKUMAR MOHANLAL SONI Advocate - Y P CHAVDA

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

23-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

17-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

28-01-2026

SERVICE OF PROCESS

07-01-2026

SERVICE OF PROCESS

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Banaskantha) allowed the review petition to correct a clerical error in the original award. The tribunal added claimant "Dehliben" (Appellant No. 4) as a proper party to the case and ordered the compensation of Rs. 14 lakhs to be equally divided among three claimants instead of four. Additionally, 50% of the awarded amount will be paid immediately to the first claimant, while the remaining 50% for the minor claimants (Appellants 2 and 3) will be deposited in fixed deposits until they attain majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Banaskantha) allowed the review petition to correct a clerical error in the original award. The tribunal added claimant "Dehliben" (Appellant No. 4) as a proper party to the case and ordered the compensation of Rs. 14 lakhs to be equally divided among three claimants instead of four. Additionally, 50% of the awarded amount will be paid immediately to the first claimant, while the remaining 50% for the minor claimants (Appellants 2 and 3) will be deposited in fixed deposits until they attain majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case