Government of Gujarat vs NATHABHAI KESHABHAI NANABHAI KHARADI Advocate - S M CHAUDHARI — 66/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103(1),296,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK010028312025
Filing Number
66/2025
Filing Date
23-Jul-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
23-Jul-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195003250298
Police Station
AMIRGADH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. R P VAISHNAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATHABHAI KESHABHAI NANABHAI KHARADI Advocate - S M CHAUDHARI
-
2.GALBIBEN W/O NATHABHAI KESHABHAI KHARADI
Adv. S M CHAUDHARI
-
3.NEETABEN D/O NATHABHAI KESHABHAI KHARADI
Adv. S M CHAUDHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary of Court Judgment In this Sessions Case from Banaskantha, Gujarat, the Sessions Judge acquitted three accused (Nathabhai Keshabhavi Kharadi, Galbiben, and Nitaben) of charges under BNS Sections 103(1), 296, and 341(3) read with 34. The court found that while the complainant's husband died from injuries sustained during an alleged altercation over land dispute on April 16, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. Despite medical evidence confirming the victim's fatal injuries, the court determined that the prosecution's witnesses could not reliably identify the accused as perpetrators or corroborate the complaint's narrative, leading to their acquittal on March 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
Principal District Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2025
Summary of Court Judgment In this Sessions Case from Banaskantha, Gujarat, the Sessions Judge acquitted three accused (Nathabhai Keshabhavi Kharadi, Galbiben, and Nitaben) of charges under BNS Sections 103(1), 296, and 341(3) read with 34. The court found that while the complainant's husband died from injuries sustained during an alleged altercation over land dispute on April 16, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. Despite medical evidence confirming the victim's fatal injuries, the court determined that the prosecution's witnesses could not reliably identify the accused as perpetrators or corroborate the complaint's narrative, leading to their acquittal on March 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts