THAKOR HANSABEN SHAMBHUJI vs PRAKASHKUMAR RANULAL KHATRI Advocate - D J TIWARI — 195/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJBK010026502025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

195/2025

Filing Date

07-07-2025

Registration No

195/2025

Registration Date

07-07-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 164,

Petitioner(s)

THAKOR HANSABEN SHAMBHUJI

Adv. C S PARMAR

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHKUMAR RANULAL KHATRI Advocate - D J TIWARI

MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Adv. N M JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

15-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,50,000 compensation to the applicant under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act for grievous injuries sustained in a February 20, 2025 road accident, applying "no-fault liability" principles without requiring proof of negligence. Both the vehicle owner and insurance company were held jointly and severally liable, with the tribunal rejecting the insurer's defense regarding the driver's missing valid license, finding no proof that this was fundamental to causing the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,50,000 compensation to the applicant under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act for grievous injuries sustained in a February 20, 2025 road accident, applying "no-fault liability" principles without requiring proof of negligence. Both the vehicle owner and insurance company were held jointly and severally liable, with the tribunal rejecting the insurer's defense regarding the driver's missing valid license, finding no proof that this was fundamental to causing the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case