MAHENDRABHAI NAGJIBHAI CHAUDHARY vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D K PUROHIT — 268/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK010010132026

Filing Number

268/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

268/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1199500125010

Police Station

STATE MONITORING CELL POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.MAHENDRABHAI NAGJIBHAI CHAUDHARY

Adv. P S SADHU

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D K PUROHIT

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
25-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case 268/2026 Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's bail application due to procedural deficiencies. The petitioner failed to provide necessary supporting documents referenced in the petition and did not furnish copies to the opposing counsel (Government of Gujarat Advocate), as required by court rules. The court held that without complete and proper documentation, it could not adjudicate the bail plea fairly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
25-Mar-2026

Disposed

3rd Addl District Judge
23-Mar-2026

Reply Of I.O.

3rd Addl District Judge
18-Mar-2026

Reply Of I.O.

3rd Addl District Judge
17-Mar-2026

Reply Of I.O.

3rd Addl District Judge
16-Mar-2026

Process To Respondents

3rd Addl District Judge
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 268/2026 Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's bail application due to procedural deficiencies. The petitioner failed to provide necessary supporting documents referenced in the petition and did not furnish copies to the opposing counsel (Government of Gujarat Advocate), as required by court rules. The court held that without complete and proper documentation, it could not adjudicate the bail plea fairly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.