KISHORBHAI MISRILAL GAUR(BRAHMAN) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J S PATEL — 258/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK010008762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

258/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195010251069

Police Station

PALANPUR CITY WEST POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

KISHORBHAI MISRILAL GAUR(BRAHMAN)

Adv. N R GOYAL

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - J S PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 258/2026 Kishorbhai Misrilal Gaur v. Government of Gujarat The Third Additional Sessions Court (Palanpur) granted the petitioner's application under CRPC Section 497 to recover a seized Mahindra vehicle (2007 model) from police custody. The court found the petitioner was the registered owner and held that prolonged police retention of non-evidentiary seized property risks deterioration. The vehicle was ordered released on bond and guarantee, with conditions including photographic documentation and prohibition on unauthorized use or modification, pending case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 258/2026 Kishorbhai Misrilal Gaur v. Government of Gujarat The Third Additional Sessions Court (Palanpur) granted the petitioner's application under CRPC Section 497 to recover a seized Mahindra vehicle (2007 model) from police custody. The court found the petitioner was the registered owner and held that prolonged police retention of non-evidentiary seized property risks deterioration. The vehicle was ordered released on bond and guarantee, with conditions including photographic documentation and prohibition on unauthorized use or modification, pending case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case