HARCHANDJI PUJAJI PATEL (CHAUDHARY) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A TRIVEDI — 250/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK010008342026
Filing Number
250/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
250/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195050220151
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARCHANDJI PUJAJI PATEL (CHAUDHARY)
Adv. N M BATUA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Harchandji Pujaji Patel under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of land grabbing under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, having allegedly forcefully entered and usurped the complainant's land and constructed unauthorized structures. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on witness statements and investigation officer's affidavit, noting that the applicant was a wanted accused who had absconded for a long time. The court rejected the parity argument comparing the applicant's release with co-accused already granted bail, holding that the applicant's role was more serious and a co-accused had breached bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 250/2026
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Harchandji Pujaji Patel under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of land grabbing under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, having allegedly forcefully entered and usurped the complainant's land and constructed unauthorized structures. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on witness statements and investigation officer's affidavit, noting that the applicant was a wanted accused who had absconded for a long time. The court rejected the parity argument comparing the applicant's release with co-accused already granted bail, holding that the applicant's role was more serious and a co-accused had breached bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts