HARCHANDJI PUJAJI PATEL (CHAUDHARY) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A TRIVEDI — 250/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK010008342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195050220151

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

HARCHANDJI PUJAJI PATEL (CHAUDHARY)

Adv. N M BATUA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

10-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court rejected the bail application of Harchandji Pujaji Patel under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of land grabbing under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, having allegedly forcefully entered and usurped the complainant's land and constructed unauthorized structures. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on witness statements and investigation officer's affidavit, noting that the applicant was a wanted accused who had absconded for a long time. The court rejected the parity argument comparing the applicant's release with co-accused already granted bail, holding that the applicant's role was more serious and a co-accused had breached bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of Harchandji Pujaji Patel under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of land grabbing under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, having allegedly forcefully entered and usurped the complainant's land and constructed unauthorized structures. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on witness statements and investigation officer's affidavit, noting that the applicant was a wanted accused who had absconded for a long time. The court rejected the parity argument comparing the applicant's release with co-accused already granted bail, holding that the applicant's role was more serious and a co-accused had breached bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case