HARCHANDJI PUJAJI PATEL (CHAUDHARY) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A TRIVEDI — 250/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK010008342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
250/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
250/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195050220151
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARCHANDJI PUJAJI PATEL (CHAUDHARY)
Adv. N M BATUA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 13-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 10-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Harchandji Pujaji Patel under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of land grabbing under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, having allegedly forcefully entered and usurped the complainant's land and constructed unauthorized structures. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on witness statements and investigation officer's affidavit, noting that the applicant was a wanted accused who had absconded for a long time. The court rejected the parity argument comparing the applicant's release with co-accused already granted bail, holding that the applicant's role was more serious and a co-accused had breached bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the bail application of Harchandji Pujaji Patel under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of land grabbing under the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, having allegedly forcefully entered and usurped the complainant's land and constructed unauthorized structures. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on witness statements and investigation officer's affidavit, noting that the applicant was a wanted accused who had absconded for a long time. The court rejected the parity argument comparing the applicant's release with co-accused already granted bail, holding that the applicant's role was more serious and a co-accused had breached bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts