JAYESHBHAI PREMABHAI DUNGAISHA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P VAISHNAV — 248/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK010008292026

Filing Number

248/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

248/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195002250650

Police Station

AMBAJI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYESHBHAI PREMABHAI DUNGAISHA

    Adv. A J YAGNIK

  2. 2.HONABHAI SOMABHAI DUNGAISHA

  3. 3.DINESHBHAI ARJANBHAI ANGARI

  4. 4.JONABHAI SOMABHAI BHAGORA

  5. 5.SAVABHAI BHANABHAI BHAGORA

  6. 6.MANJIRA ARJANBHAI BHAGORA

  7. 7.BHURABHAI KESHABHAI BHAGORA

  8. 8.BHOMABHAI KESHABHAI PARMAR

  9. 9.SHAKURABHAI BHERABHAI DUNGAISHA

  10. 10.CHHOGABHAI KESHABHAI ANGARI

  11. 11.MUNGLABHAI SOMABHAI DUNGAISHA

  12. 12.VAGHABHAI SOMABHAI PARMAR

  13. 13.MITHABHAI BHANABHAI BHAGORA

  14. 14.RAJESHBHAI ARJANBHAI BHAGORA

  15. 15.SHANARBHAI THAWRABHAI BHAGORA

  16. 16.DITABHAI RAJABHAI DAMOR

  17. 17.SHAKRABHAI KIRABHAI PARMAR

  18. 18.BHARATBHAI HIRABHAI BHAGORA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P VAISHNAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by 18 tribal applicants accused of violent crimes including attacking forest and police officials, property damage, and looting during a confrontation over forest land plantations on December 13, 2025. The Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence of serious offenses and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary, ruling that releasing the applicants on bail would risk further violence, community incitement, witness intimidation, and obstruction of ongoing investigations involving multiple remaining accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Principal District Judge

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by 18 tribal applicants accused of violent crimes including attacking forest and police officials, property damage, and looting during a confrontation over forest land plantations on December 13, 2025. The Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence of serious offenses and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary, ruling that releasing the applicants on bail would risk further violence, community incitement, witness intimidation, and obstruction of ongoing investigations involving multiple remaining accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case