KALPESHJI ALIAS PRAKASHJI VINODBHAI DHULABHAI TAKARVADIYA (THAKOR) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA — 246/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK010008262026

Filing Number

246/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

246/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195024250891

Police Station

GADH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALPESHJI ALIAS PRAKASHJI VINODBHAI DHULABHAI TAKARVADIYA (THAKOR)

    Adv. M M SINDHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court (POCSO) in Banaskantha granted bail to the accused Kalpesh (alias Prakash) in a burglary case under IPC sections 380 and 381, finding that there was sufficient evidence linking him to the theft of jewelry worth Rs. 53,400 from a shop through CCTV footage and his own confession. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including regular police station reporting, passport surrender, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining residence, considering the nature of the crime and the accused's stable local roots in Takarvada. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 246/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court (POCSO) in Banaskantha granted bail to the accused Kalpesh (alias Prakash) in a burglary case under IPC sections 380 and 381, finding that there was sufficient evidence linking him to the theft of jewelry worth Rs. 53,400 from a shop through CCTV footage and his own confession. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including regular police station reporting, passport surrender, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining residence, considering the nature of the crime and the accused's stable local roots in Takarvada. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case