GOVABHAI ALIAS GOVINDBHAI GULABHAI PARMAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P VAISHNAV — 243/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK010007982026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
243/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
243/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195002250450
Police Station
AMBAJI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVABHAI ALIAS GOVINDBHAI GULABHAI PARMAR
Adv. Y L BACHANI
RAJUBHAI GULABHAI PARMAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P VAISHNAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge, Banaskantha partially allowed the temporary bail application. Applicant No.1 (Govabhai Parmar) was granted 7-day temporary bail (reduced from the requested 15 days) to perform post-death ceremonies for his father who died in custody on 23.02.2026, subject to depositing Rs.50,000 surety, daily police reporting, and strict bail conditions. Applicant No.2's application was withdrawn, and the court rejected the prosecution's concerns about witness intimidation given the compelling humanitarian circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge, Banaskantha partially allowed the temporary bail application. Applicant No.1 (Govabhai Parmar) was granted 7-day temporary bail (reduced from the requested 15 days) to perform post-death ceremonies for his father who died in custody on 23.02.2026, subject to depositing Rs.50,000 surety, daily police reporting, and strict bail conditions. Applicant No.2's application was withdrawn, and the court rejected the prosecution's concerns about witness intimidation given the compelling humanitarian circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts