LADHABHAI BHURABHAI GAMAR vs GO DIGITAL INSURANCE CO.LTD — 274/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJBK010007762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

274/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 2,

Petitioner(s)

LADHABHAI BHURABHAI GAMAR

Adv. R.J.BARAD

ANDUBEN LADHABHAI GAMAR

PAJALIBEN SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR

MINOR JIGNESHBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR

MINOR VINODBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR

MINOR RAVIBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR

MINOR SAVITABEN SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR

MINOR ANJALIBEN SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR

Respondent(s)

GO DIGITAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
ORDER

The court approved the applicants' petition to withdraw fixed deposits (FDs) held in State Bank of India, Danta branch, totaling approximately ₹16,49,754 with accrued interest, which were originally deposited as per a previous lok adalat settlement. The court ordered the bank to release the full FD amounts to the eight adult applicants for their maintenance and house construction needs, while directing that FDs held in the names of minor applicants (four children) be utilized solely for their welfare and sustenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the applicants' petition to withdraw fixed deposits (FDs) held in State Bank of India, Danta branch, totaling approximately ₹16,49,754 with accrued interest, which were originally deposited as per a previous lok adalat settlement. The court ordered the bank to release the full FD amounts to the eight adult applicants for their maintenance and house construction needs, while directing that FDs held in the names of minor applicants (four children) be utilized solely for their welfare and sustenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case