LADHABHAI BHURABHAI GAMAR vs GO DIGITAL INSURANCE CO.LTD — 274/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJBK010007762026
Filing Number
274/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
274/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LADHABHAI BHURABHAI GAMAR
Adv. R.J.BARAD
-
2.ANDUBEN LADHABHAI GAMAR
-
3.PAJALIBEN SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR
-
4.MINOR JIGNESHBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR
-
5.MINOR VINODBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR
-
6.MINOR RAVIBHAI SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR
-
7.MINOR SAVITABEN SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR
-
8.MINOR ANJALIBEN SHRAVANBHAI GAMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.GO DIGITAL INSURANCE CO.LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court approved the applicants' petition to withdraw fixed deposits (FDs) held in State Bank of India, Danta branch, totaling approximately ₹16,49,754 with accrued interest, which were originally deposited as per a previous lok adalat settlement. The court ordered the bank to release the full FD amounts to the eight adult applicants for their maintenance and house construction needs, while directing that FDs held in the names of minor applicants (four children) be utilized solely for their welfare and sustenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 274/2026
The court approved the applicants' petition to withdraw fixed deposits (FDs) held in State Bank of India, Danta branch, totaling approximately ₹16,49,754 with accrued interest, which were originally deposited as per a previous lok adalat settlement. The court ordered the bank to release the full FD amounts to the eight adult applicants for their maintenance and house construction needs, while directing that FDs held in the names of minor applicants (four children) be utilized solely for their welfare and sustenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts