KAMALESHKUMAR VALABHAI BHATERIYA(BHATIYA) vs SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD. POA HOLDER PRAMOD M. CHAUDHARY Advocate - B J JOSHI — 83/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3),. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBK010007742026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415(3),
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

KAMALESHKUMAR VALABHAI BHATERIYA(BHATIYA)

Adv. V B RAMSENA

Respondent(s)

SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD. POA HOLDER PRAMOD M. CHAUDHARY Advocate - B J JOSHI

Government of Gujarat

Adv. J S PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

FOR R&P

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court allowed the criminal appeal based on a settlement reached between both parties. The appellant had been convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 and sentenced to imprisonment with compensation to the complainant, but after reconciliation at the appellate stage where the appellant paid the full outstanding cheque amount, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, setting aside the trial court's order entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the criminal appeal based on a settlement reached between both parties. The appellant had been convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 and sentenced to imprisonment with compensation to the complainant, but after reconciliation at the appellate stage where the appellant paid the full outstanding cheque amount, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, setting aside the trial court's order entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case