KAMALESHKUMAR VALABHAI BHATERIYA(BHATIYA) vs SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD. POA HOLDER PRAMOD M. CHAUDHARY Advocate - B J JOSHI — 83/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBK010007742026

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMALESHKUMAR VALABHAI BHATERIYA(BHATIYA)

    Adv. V B RAMSENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD. POA HOLDER PRAMOD M. CHAUDHARY Advocate - B J JOSHI

  2. 2.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. J S PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the criminal appeal based on a settlement reached between both parties. The appellant had been convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 and sentenced to imprisonment with compensation to the complainant, but after reconciliation at the appellate stage where the appellant paid the full outstanding cheque amount, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, setting aside the trial court's order entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For R&P

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the criminal appeal based on a settlement reached between both parties. The appellant had been convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 and sentenced to imprisonment with compensation to the complainant, but after reconciliation at the appellate stage where the appellant paid the full outstanding cheque amount, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, setting aside the trial court's order entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case