BHAMARDAS ALIAS BHAVARDAS RAJURAM SADHU vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D K PUROHIT — 239/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJBK010007692026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

239/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

239/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195050211324

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,

Petitioner(s)

BHAMARDAS ALIAS BHAVARDAS RAJURAM SADHU

Adv. A B RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - D K PUROHIT

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court at Palanpur granted the applicant's petition under Section 497 of the CrPC to recover a Maruti Swift car (Registration No. GJ-12-DA-8444) seized as evidence in a drug smuggling case. The court found that the applicant, despite multiple previous applications before this and the High Court, had legitimate grounds for recovery as the vehicle's condition would deteriorate in police custody, and no legal impediment existed to return the seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court at Palanpur granted the applicant's petition under Section 497 of the CrPC to recover a Maruti Swift car (Registration No. GJ-12-DA-8444) seized as evidence in a drug smuggling case. The court found that the applicant, despite multiple previous applications before this and the High Court, had legitimate grounds for recovery as the vehicle's condition would deteriorate in police custody, and no legal impediment existed to return the seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case