ZALA MAYURSINH INDRASINH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D K PUROHIT — 233/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK010007592026
Filing Number
233/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996005260045
Police Station
SUIGAM POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ZALA MAYURSINH INDRASINH
Adv. A N ACHARYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D K PUROHIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court granted the applicant Mayursinh Indrasinh Jhala's petition under BNS Section 497 to recover a seized Tata Motors trailer (vehicle registration GJ-12-CT-2205) used in a drug smuggling case. The court found that the applicant, as the registered owner, was not involved in the crime and that the driver misused the vehicle without his knowledge, therefore ordering return of the vehicle in custody with specified conditions including bond, security deposit, and restrictions on transfer or misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Summary The court granted the applicant Mayursinh Indrasinh Jhala's petition under BNS Section 497 to recover a seized Tata Motors trailer (vehicle registration GJ-12-CT-2205) used in a drug smuggling case. The court found that the applicant, as the registered owner, was not involved in the crime and that the driver misused the vehicle without his knowledge, therefore ordering return of the vehicle in custody with specified conditions including bond, security deposit, and restrictions on transfer or misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts