DILIP ARJUNBHAI DABHI(BAVARI) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J S PATEL — 221/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK010007212026
Filing Number
221/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
221/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195010251122
Police Station
PALANPUR CITY WEST POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP ARJUNBHAI DABHI(BAVARI)
Adv. U A MIRZA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J S PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court rejected the bail application of Dilip Arjunbhai Rajpurohit (Bavri), who was accused under BNS sections 103(1), 109(1), 114(1), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 3(5), 324(4), 63(1) and IPC section 135 in connection with a criminal case involving an unlawful assembly and assault. The court found that the applicant's involvement in the conspiracy, his role in carrying weapons, and his connection to the main accused made him equally culpable despite arguments regarding insufficient evidence, and consequently dismissed his regular bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 221/2026
The court rejected the bail application of Dilip Arjunbhai Rajpurohit (Bavri), who was accused under BNS sections 103(1), 109(1), 114(1), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 3(5), 324(4), 63(1) and IPC section 135 in connection with a criminal case involving an unlawful assembly and assault. The court found that the applicant's involvement in the conspiracy, his role in carrying weapons, and his connection to the main accused made him equally culpable despite arguments regarding insufficient evidence, and consequently dismissed his regular bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts