ABHAYKUMAR RAJESHBHAI SOHARA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J S PATEL — 37/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJBK010006942022
Filing Number
37/2022
Filing Date
31-03-2022
Registration No
37/2022
Registration Date
31-03-2022
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
AMIRGADH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHAYKUMAR RAJESHBHAI SOHARA
Adv. D G VAISHNAV
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - J S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 30-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of defendant Abhayakumar Rajshbhai Sohra, upholding his conviction under IPC Section 324 (causing grievous injury) by the trial court. The court found credible evidence from the complainant, eyewitnesses, and medical records conclusively proving that the appellant struck the victim with an iron pipe on his leg, causing a fracture. However, considering the appellant's family responsibilities and rehabilitation potential, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for two years instead of rigorous imprisonment, subject to specified conditions including a bond of Rs. 1,00,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of defendant Abhayakumar Rajshbhai Sohra, upholding his conviction under IPC Section 324 (causing grievous injury) by the trial court. The court found credible evidence from the complainant, eyewitnesses, and medical records conclusively proving that the appellant struck the victim with an iron pipe on his leg, causing a fracture. However, considering the appellant's family responsibilities and rehabilitation potential, the court granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for two years instead of rigorous imprisonment, subject to specified conditions including a bond of Rs. 1,00,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts