SHAKTIDAN JAVAHIRDAN CHARAN- ROYALTY INSPECTOR vs SOLANKI AJAYSINH NARSINHJI OWNER OF KOBELCO COMPANY BLUE EXCAVATOR MACHINE Advocate - N R GOYAL — 14/2026
Case under Mines and Minerals (development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 4(1),4(1)A,21(1),22,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK010006842026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAKTIDAN JAVAHIRDAN CHARAN- ROYALTY INSPECTOR
Adv. D H CHAPIYA
Respondent(s)
SOLANKI AJAYSINH NARSINHJI OWNER OF KOBELCO COMPANY BLUE EXCAVATOR MACHINE Advocate - N R GOYAL
PRAKASHSINGH SOVANJI SOLANKI OPERATOR OF KOBELCO COMPANY BLUE EXCAVATOR
Adv. N R GOYAL
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
OPENING UP OF CASE BY PROSECUTION
OPENING UP OF CASE BY PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | OPENING UP OF CASE BY PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | OPENING UP OF CASE BY PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Banaskantha acquitted two defendants charged under the Gujarat Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 after they settled the case through lok adalat (public court). The defendants, who operated an excavator machine engaged in illegal sand mining, compensated the complainant (Royalty Inspector) and deposited the prescribed penalty with the Forest Department, thereby satisfying all legal obligations under Rule 21(2) of the Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Banaskantha acquitted two defendants charged under the Gujarat Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 after they settled the case through lok adalat (public court). The defendants, who operated an excavator machine engaged in illegal sand mining, compensated the complainant (Royalty Inspector) and deposited the prescribed penalty with the Forest Department, thereby satisfying all legal obligations under Rule 21(2) of the Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts